Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Allegro Microsystems › Earnings quality

Allegro Microsystems earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score83 / 100 · grade A · rank 29 of 1027

Allegro Microsystems (ALGM) scores 83 of 100 for earnings quality, grade A: rank 29 of 1027 companies and 6 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on adjusted earnings 79% below GAAP, discretionary accruals of -1.5% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most, Piotroski F-score 7 of 9. It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.97: clean (below −2.22), Dechow F-score 0.37 (normal), Montier C-score 0 of 6 checks failed.

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -12.5% of assets, lower than 89% of companies (profit backed by cash)1820
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.97: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.37 (normal)1515
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 0 of 6 checks failed1515
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -1.5% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most710
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 7 of 9810
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 79% below GAAP010
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.88)55
ALGM: share of the available points, by componentALGM: share of the available points, by componentAccruals89%Discretionary accruals74%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score100%Piotroski F-score78%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Allegro Microsystems: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.