Filing Flows › Companies › Andersons › Earnings quality
Andersons earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score36 / 100 · grade D · rank 987 of 1027
Andersons (ANDE) scores 36 of 100 for earnings quality, grade D: rank 987 of 1027 companies and 266 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on accruals of -2.1% of assets, higher than 72% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 4 of 5 checks failed, discretionary accruals of +3.6% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most.
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -2.1% of assets, higher than 72% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 8 | 29 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 4 of 5 checks failed | 4 | 21 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of +3.6% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most | 6 | 14 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 5 of 9 | 8 | 14 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 11% below GAAP | 9 | 14 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.02) | 0 | 7 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Andersons: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.