Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Avient › Earnings quality

Avient earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score65 / 100 · grade B · rank 550 of 1027

Avient (AVNT) scores 65 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 550 of 1027 companies and 57 of 82 in materials. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.7% of assets, higher than 54% of companies (profit backed by cash), adjusted earnings 39% below GAAP, Montier C-score 3 of 6 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.54: clean (below −2.22), Dechow F-score 0.55 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 4.12).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -3.7% of assets, higher than 54% of companies (profit backed by cash)920
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.54: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.55 (normal)1515
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 3 of 6 checks failed815
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +2.2% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most610
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 6 of 9710
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 39% below GAAP010
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 4.12)55
AVNT: share of the available points, by componentAVNT: share of the available points, by componentAccruals46%Discretionary accruals64%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score50%Piotroski F-score67%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Avient: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.