Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Avantor › Earnings quality

Avantor earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score63 / 100 · grade C · rank 615 of 1027

Avantor (AVTR) scores 63 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 615 of 1027 companies and 137 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on Montier C-score 4 of 6 checks failed, adjusted earnings 40% below GAAP, Dechow F-score 1.80 (above normal). It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.87: clean (below −2.22), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 3.07).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -9.7% of assets, lower than 83% of companies (profit backed by cash)1620
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.87: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.80 (above normal)715
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 4 of 6 checks failed515
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -1.4% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most810
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 6 of 9710
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 40% below GAAP010
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 3.07)55
AVTR: share of the available points, by componentAVTR: share of the available points, by componentAccruals82%Discretionary accruals76%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score45%Montier C-score33%Piotroski F-score67%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Avantor: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.