Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Blackberry › Earnings quality

Blackberry earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score50 / 100 · grade C · rank 882 of 1027

Blackberry (BB) scores 50 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 882 of 1027 companies and 174 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on accruals of +0.2% of assets, higher than 88% of companies, adjusted earnings 39% below GAAP, discretionary accruals of +10.5% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 1.15 (above normal), Beneish M-score -2.51: clean (below −2.22), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 2.66).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of +0.2% of assets, higher than 88% of companies220
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.51: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.15 (above normal)1415
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 3 of 5 checks failed615
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +10.5% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most110
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 6 of 9710
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 39% below GAAP010
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 2.66)55
BB: share of the available points, by componentBB: share of the available points, by componentAccruals12%Discretionary accruals10%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score90%Montier C-score40%Piotroski F-score67%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Blackberry: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.