Filing Flows › Companies › Cardinal Health › Earnings quality
Cardinal Health earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score68 / 100 · grade B · rank 398 of 1027
Cardinal Health (CAH) scores 68 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 398 of 1027 companies and 34 of 126 in health. It loses the most points on discretionary accruals of -19.9% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, accruals of -6.3% of assets, lower than 67% of companies (profit backed by cash), Dechow F-score 1.62 (above normal). It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.75: clean (below −2.22), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.11).
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -6.3% of assets, lower than 67% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 15 | 22 |
| Beneish M-score | Beneish M-score -2.75: clean (below −2.22) | 17 | 17 |
| Dechow F-score | Dechow F-score 1.62 (above normal) | 10 | 17 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 1 of 6 checks failed | 14 | 17 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of -19.9% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most | 0 | 11 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 6 of 9 | 7 | 11 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.11) | 6 | 6 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Cardinal Health: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.