Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › CareDx › Earnings quality

CareDx earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score68 / 100 · grade B · rank 426 of 1027

CareDx (CDNA) scores 68 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 426 of 1027 companies and 39 of 126 in health. It loses the most points on adjusted earnings 58% above GAAP, discretionary accruals of -11.1% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, Montier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.47 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 2.64). Revenue grew 39% in the year: fast growth raises accruals, the Beneish and Dechow scores and the C-score by construction, so a growing company scores lower than a steady one with the same accounting.

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -14.0% of assets, lower than 91% of companies (profit backed by cash)2427
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.47 (normal)2020
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed1620
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -11.1% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most113
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 58% above GAAP013
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 2.64)77
CDNA: share of the available points, by componentCDNA: share of the available points, by componentAccruals91%Discretionary accruals9%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score80%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → CareDx: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.