Filing Flows › Companies › Clearfield › Earnings quality
Clearfield earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score67 / 100 · grade B · rank 488 of 1027
Clearfield (CLFD) scores 67 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 488 of 1027 companies and 110 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on adjusted earnings 278% below GAAP, discretionary accruals of -3.4% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, Montier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.54 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 3.82). Revenue grew 34% in the year: fast growth raises accruals, the Beneish and Dechow scores and the C-score by construction, so a growing company scores lower than a steady one with the same accounting.
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dechow F-score | Dechow F-score 0.54 (normal) | 27 | 27 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed | 22 | 27 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of -3.4% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most | 8 | 18 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 278% below GAAP | 0 | 18 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 3.82) | 9 | 9 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Clearfield: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.