Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Cooper Companies › Earnings quality

Cooper Companies earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score59 / 100 · grade C · rank 726 of 1027

Cooper Companies (COO) scores 59 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 726 of 1027 companies and 82 of 126 in health. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.4% of assets, higher than 58% of companies (profit backed by cash), adjusted earnings 38% below GAAP, Dechow F-score 1.50 (above normal). It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.50: clean (below −2.22), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 13.33).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -3.4% of assets, higher than 58% of companies (profit backed by cash)820
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.50: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.50 (above normal)1015
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 2 of 6 checks failed1015
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -3.3% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most510
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 5 of 9610
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 38% below GAAP010
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 13.33)55
COO: share of the available points, by componentCOO: share of the available points, by componentAccruals42%Discretionary accruals49%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score65%Montier C-score67%Piotroski F-score56%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Cooper Companies: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.