Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. › Earnings quality

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score57 / 100 · grade C · rank 758 of 1027

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) scores 57 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 758 of 1027 companies and 41 of 55 in utilities. It loses the most points on accruals of +1.3% of assets, higher than 91% of companies, adjusted earnings 20% above GAAP, discretionary accruals of +2.5% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.38 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.31).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of +1.3% of assets, higher than 91% of companies227
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.38 (normal)2020
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed1620
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +2.5% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most813
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 20% above GAAP413
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.31)77
CQP: share of the available points, by componentCQP: share of the available points, by componentAccruals9%Discretionary accruals59%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score80%Non-GAAP gap32%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.