Filing Flows › Companies › EOG Resources › Earnings quality
EOG Resources earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score76 / 100 · grade B · rank 130 of 1027
EOG Resources (EOG) scores 76 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 130 of 1027 companies and 15 of 34 in energy. It loses the most points on Montier C-score 4 of 5 checks failed, accruals of -10.2% of assets, lower than 85% of companies (profit backed by cash). It earns full or near-full marks for discretionary accruals of -0.9% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most, adjusted earnings 4% below GAAP, Dechow F-score 0.39 (normal). Revenue grew 32% in the year: fast growth raises accruals, the Beneish and Dechow scores and the C-score by construction, so a growing company scores lower than a steady one with the same accounting.
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -10.2% of assets, lower than 85% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 23 | 27 |
| Dechow F-score | Dechow F-score 0.39 (normal) | 20 | 20 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 4 of 5 checks failed | 4 | 20 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of -0.9% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most | 11 | 13 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 4% below GAAP | 12 | 13 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.75) | 7 | 7 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → EOG Resources: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.