Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › F5 › Earnings quality

F5 earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score80 / 100 · grade A · rank 58 of 1027

F5 (FFIV) scores 80 of 100 for earnings quality, grade A: rank 58 of 1027 companies and 10 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on accruals of -4.3% of assets, lower than 52% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 3 of 6 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for discretionary accruals of -0.8% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most, Beneish M-score -2.61: clean (below −2.22), Dechow F-score 0.47 (normal).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -4.3% of assets, lower than 52% of companies (profit backed by cash)1222
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.61: clean (below −2.22)1717
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.47 (normal)1717
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 3 of 6 checks failed817
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -0.8% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most1011
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 9 of 91111
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.91)66
FFIV: share of the available points, by componentFFIV: share of the available points, by componentAccruals52%Discretionary accruals86%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score50%Piotroski F-score100%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → F5: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.