Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › First Solar › Earnings quality

First Solar earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score84 / 100 · grade A · rank 20 of 1027

First Solar (FSLR) scores 84 of 100 for earnings quality, grade A: rank 20 of 1027 companies and 4 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on accruals of -4.2% of assets, lower than 51% of companies (profit backed by cash), discretionary accruals of -3.1% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most. It earns full or near-full marks for Piotroski F-score 8 of 9, adjusted and GAAP earnings agree, Beneish M-score -2.56: clean (below −2.22).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -4.2% of assets, lower than 51% of companies (profit backed by cash)1020
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.56: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.62 (normal)1515
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 0 of 5 checks failed1515
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -3.1% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most510
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 8 of 9910
Non-GAAP gapadjusted and GAAP earnings agree1010
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.88)55
FSLR: share of the available points, by componentFSLR: share of the available points, by componentAccruals51%Discretionary accruals50%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score100%Piotroski F-score89%Non-GAAP gap99%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → First Solar: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.