Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › GXO Logistics › Earnings quality

GXO Logistics earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score49 / 100 · grade D · rank 895 of 1027

GXO Logistics (GXO) scores 49 of 100 for earnings quality, grade D: rank 895 of 1027 companies and 228 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.4% of assets, higher than 59% of companies (profit backed by cash), adjusted earnings 58% below GAAP, Montier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.91).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -3.4% of assets, higher than 59% of companies (profit backed by cash)1127
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.54 (above normal)1320
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed1220
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +2.9% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most713
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 58% below GAAP013
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.91)77
GXO: share of the available points, by componentGXO: share of the available points, by componentAccruals41%Discretionary accruals53%Dechow F-score63%Montier C-score60%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → GXO Logistics: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.