Filing Flows › Companies › Healthcare Services Group › Earnings quality
Healthcare Services Group earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score77 / 100 · grade B · rank 125 of 1027
Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) scores 77 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 125 of 1027 companies and 9 of 126 in health. It loses the most points on profit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.11), Montier C-score 1 of 4 checks failed, accruals of -10.8% of assets, lower than 86% of companies (profit backed by cash). It earns full or near-full marks for Piotroski F-score 8 of 9.
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -10.8% of assets, lower than 86% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 29 | 33 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 1 of 4 checks failed | 19 | 25 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 8 of 9 | 15 | 17 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 4% below GAAP | 15 | 17 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.11) | 0 | 8 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Healthcare Services Group: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.