Filing Flows › Companies › H&R Block › Earnings quality
H&R Block earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score81 / 100 · grade A · rank 49 of 1027
H&R Block (HRB) scores 81 of 100 for earnings quality, grade A: rank 49 of 1027 companies and 10 of 141 in consumer-disc. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.2% of assets, higher than 60% of companies (profit backed by cash), Piotroski F-score 7 of 9, adjusted earnings 6% above GAAP. It earns full or near-full marks for discretionary accruals of -1.1% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most, profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.59), Beneish M-score -2.65: clean (below −2.22).
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -3.2% of assets, higher than 60% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 8 | 20 |
| Beneish M-score | Beneish M-score -2.65: clean (below −2.22) | 15 | 15 |
| Dechow F-score | Dechow F-score 0.37 (normal) | 15 | 15 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 0 of 5 checks failed | 15 | 15 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of -1.1% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most | 8 | 10 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 7 of 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 6% above GAAP | 8 | 10 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.59) | 4 | 5 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → H&R Block: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.