Filing Flows › Companies › i-80 Gold › Earnings quality
i-80 Gold earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score90 / 100 · grade A · rank 2 of 1027
i-80 Gold (IAUX) scores 90 of 100 for earnings quality, grade A: rank 2 of 1027 companies and 1 of 82 in materials. It loses the most points on Piotroski F-score 5 of 9, Montier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for accruals of -17.0% of assets, lower than 95% of companies (profit backed by cash), discretionary accruals of +0.0% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most, Beneish M-score -4.99: clean (below −2.22). Revenue grew 35% in the year: fast growth raises accruals, the Beneish and Dechow scores and the C-score by construction, so a growing company scores lower than a steady one with the same accounting.
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -17.0% of assets, lower than 95% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 22 | 24 |
| Beneish M-score | Beneish M-score -4.99: clean (below −2.22) | 18 | 18 |
| Dechow F-score | Dechow F-score 0.45 (normal) | 18 | 18 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed | 14 | 18 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of +0.0% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most | 12 | 12 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 5 of 9 | 6 | 12 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → i-80 Gold: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.