Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Iovance Biotherapeutics › Earnings quality

Iovance Biotherapeutics earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score68 / 100 · grade B · rank 416 of 1027

Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) scores 68 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 416 of 1027 companies and 37 of 126 in health. It loses the most points on adjusted earnings far below GAAP (more than ten times apart), discretionary accruals of +4.6% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, Piotroski F-score 4 of 9. It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.54: clean (below −2.22), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.09). Revenue grew 51% in the year: fast growth raises accruals, the Beneish and Dechow scores and the C-score by construction, so a growing company scores lower than a steady one with the same accounting.

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -9.7% of assets, lower than 83% of companies (profit backed by cash)1720
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.54: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.39 (above normal)1115
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 1 of 6 checks failed1215
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +4.6% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most410
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 4 of 9410
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings far below GAAP (more than ten times apart)010
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.09)55
IOVA: share of the available points, by componentIOVA: share of the available points, by componentAccruals83%Discretionary accruals36%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score73%Montier C-score83%Piotroski F-score44%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Iovance Biotherapeutics: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.