Filing Flows › Companies › Kura Sushi USA › Earnings quality
Kura Sushi USA earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score62 / 100 · grade C · rank 657 of 1027
Kura Sushi USA (KRUS) scores 62 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 657 of 1027 companies and 97 of 141 in consumer-disc. It loses the most points on adjusted earnings 139% below GAAP, accruals of -8.0% of assets, lower than 77% of companies (profit backed by cash), profit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.30). It earns full or near-full marks for discretionary accruals of +0.1% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most.
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -8.0% of assets, lower than 77% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 26 | 33 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 1 of 4 checks failed | 19 | 25 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of +0.1% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most | 16 | 17 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 139% below GAAP | 0 | 17 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.30) | 2 | 8 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Kura Sushi USA: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.