Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Novanta › Earnings quality

Novanta earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score40 / 100 · grade D · rank 963 of 1027

Novanta (NOVT) scores 40 of 100 for earnings quality, grade D: rank 963 of 1027 companies and 191 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on accruals of -0.6% of assets, higher than 81% of companies, Montier C-score 5 of 6 checks failed, adjusted earnings 52% below GAAP. It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.27: clean (below −2.22).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -0.6% of assets, higher than 81% of companies420
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.27: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.51 (above normal)1015
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 5 of 6 checks failed215
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +5.3% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most310
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 5 of 9610
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 52% below GAAP010
Earnings smoothnessprofit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.30)15
NOVT: share of the available points, by componentNOVT: share of the available points, by componentAccruals18%Discretionary accruals30%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score65%Montier C-score17%Piotroski F-score56%Earnings smoothness20%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Novanta: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.