Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Norfolk Southern › Earnings quality

Norfolk Southern earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score73 / 100 · grade B · rank 218 of 1027

Norfolk Southern (NSC) scores 73 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 218 of 1027 companies and 40 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.4% of assets, higher than 59% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed, discretionary accruals of +1.7% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.14 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.28).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -3.4% of assets, higher than 59% of companies (profit backed by cash)1127
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.14 (normal)2020
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed1620
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +1.7% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most1013
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 8% below GAAP1013
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.28)77
NSC: share of the available points, by componentNSC: share of the available points, by componentAccruals41%Discretionary accruals71%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score80%Non-GAAP gap72%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Norfolk Southern: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.