Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Paycom Software › Earnings quality

Paycom Software earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score50 / 100 · grade C · rank 880 of 1027

Paycom Software (PAYC) scores 50 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 880 of 1027 companies and 173 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.4% of assets, higher than 59% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 3 of 4 checks failed, adjusted earnings 23% below GAAP. It earns full or near-full marks for discretionary accruals of +0.7% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most, profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.12).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -3.4% of assets, higher than 59% of companies (profit backed by cash)1229
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 3 of 4 checks failed521
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +0.7% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most1214
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 6 of 91014
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 23% below GAAP414
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.12)77
PAYC: share of the available points, by componentPAYC: share of the available points, by componentAccruals41%Discretionary accruals87%Montier C-score25%Piotroski F-score66%Non-GAAP gap24%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Paycom Software: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.