Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › PG&E › Earnings quality

PG&E earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score76 / 100 · grade B · rank 133 of 1027

PG&E (PCG) scores 76 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 133 of 1027 companies and 11 of 55 in utilities. It loses the most points on accruals of -6.3% of assets, lower than 67% of companies (profit backed by cash), profit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.00), Montier C-score 1 of 4 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for discretionary accruals of +0.2% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most, Dechow F-score 0.19 (normal).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -6.3% of assets, lower than 67% of companies (profit backed by cash)2131
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.19 (normal)2323
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 1 of 4 checks failed1723
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +0.2% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most1515
Earnings smoothnessprofit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.00)08
PCG: share of the available points, by componentPCG: share of the available points, by componentAccruals68%Discretionary accruals97%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score75%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → PG&E: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.