Filing Flows › Companies › Park Hotels & Resorts › Earnings quality
Park Hotels & Resorts earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score59 / 100 · grade C · rank 737 of 1027
Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) scores 59 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 737 of 1027 companies and 111 of 141 in consumer-disc. It loses the most points on adjusted earnings 258% below GAAP, accruals of -8.1% of assets, lower than 77% of companies (profit backed by cash), discretionary accruals of +2.3% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most. It earns full or near-full marks for profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.81).
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -8.1% of assets, lower than 77% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 34 | 44 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of +2.3% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most | 14 | 22 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 258% below GAAP | 0 | 22 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.81) | 11 | 11 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Park Hotels & Resorts: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.