Filing Flows › Companies › Playtika Holding › Earnings quality
Playtika Holding earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score52 / 100 · grade C · rank 859 of 1027
Playtika Holding (PLTK) scores 52 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 859 of 1027 companies and 171 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on adjusted earnings 200% below GAAP, discretionary accruals of -10.1% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, Piotroski F-score 3 of 9. It earns full or near-full marks for accruals of -21.0% of assets, lower than 97% of companies (profit backed by cash), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.20).
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -21.0% of assets, lower than 97% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 35 | 36 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of -10.1% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most | 2 | 18 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 3 of 9 | 6 | 18 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 200% below GAAP | 0 | 18 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.20) | 9 | 9 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Playtika Holding: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.