Filing Flows › Companies › Prog Holdings › Earnings quality
Prog Holdings earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score58 / 100 · grade C · rank 754 of 1027
Prog Holdings (PRG) scores 58 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 754 of 1027 companies and 186 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on discretionary accruals of -10.3% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, adjusted earnings 13% below GAAP, profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.38).
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -12.0% of assets, lower than 88% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 39 | 44 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of -10.3% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most | 2 | 22 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 13% below GAAP | 13 | 22 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.38) | 4 | 11 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Prog Holdings: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.