Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Standard Motor Products › Earnings quality

Standard Motor Products earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score60 / 100 · grade C · rank 708 of 1027

Standard Motor Products (SMP) scores 60 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 708 of 1027 companies and 102 of 141 in consumer-disc. It loses the most points on accruals of -0.8% of assets, higher than 80% of companies, adjusted earnings 28% below GAAP, discretionary accruals of +4.7% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most. It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.50: clean (below −2.22), Dechow F-score 0.71 (normal).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -0.8% of assets, higher than 80% of companies420
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.50: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.71 (normal)1515
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 1 of 6 checks failed1215
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +4.7% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most310
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 6 of 9710
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 28% below GAAP110
Earnings smoothnessprofit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.49)35
SMP: share of the available points, by componentSMP: share of the available points, by componentAccruals20%Discretionary accruals34%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score83%Piotroski F-score67%Non-GAAP gap8%Earnings smoothness58%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Standard Motor Products: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.