Filing Flows › Companies › Sandisk › Earnings quality
Sandisk earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score44 / 100 · grade D · rank 932 of 1027
Sandisk (SNDK) scores 44 of 100 for earnings quality, grade D: rank 932 of 1027 companies and 186 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on accruals of -1.3% of assets, higher than 77% of companies, Beneish M-score -0.71: flagged (above −1.78), Montier C-score 5 of 6 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.56 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.14). Revenue grew 272% in the year: fast growth raises accruals, the Beneish and Dechow scores and the C-score by construction, so a growing company scores lower than a steady one with the same accounting.
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -1.3% of assets, higher than 77% of companies | 4 | 20 |
| Beneish M-score | Beneish M-score -0.71: flagged (above −1.78) | 0 | 15 |
| Dechow F-score | Dechow F-score 0.56 (normal) | 15 | 15 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 5 of 6 checks failed | 2 | 15 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of -12.7% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most | 1 | 10 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 7 of 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 6% above GAAP | 8 | 10 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.14) | 5 | 5 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Sandisk: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.