Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › SS&C Technologies Holdings › Earnings quality

SS&C Technologies Holdings earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score65 / 100 · grade B · rank 538 of 1027

SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) scores 65 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 538 of 1027 companies and 124 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on Dechow F-score 1.97 (substantial), accruals of -4.8% of assets, lower than 56% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.63), Beneish M-score -2.62: clean (below −2.22).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -4.8% of assets, lower than 56% of companies (profit backed by cash)1222
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.62: clean (below −2.22)1717
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.97 (substantial)617
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed1017
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +1.8% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most811
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 6 of 9711
Earnings smoothnessprofit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.63)56
SSNC: share of the available points, by componentSSNC: share of the available points, by componentAccruals56%Discretionary accruals69%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score34%Montier C-score60%Piotroski F-score67%Earnings smoothness86%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → SS&C Technologies Holdings: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.