Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Skyworks Solutions › Earnings quality

Skyworks Solutions earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score76 / 100 · grade B · rank 137 of 1027

Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) scores 76 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 137 of 1027 companies and 29 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on discretionary accruals of -5.3% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, Montier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed, Piotroski F-score 5 of 9. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 1.10 (above normal), Beneish M-score -2.89: clean (below −2.22), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.52).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -10.2% of assets, lower than 84% of companies (profit backed by cash)1922
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.89: clean (below −2.22)1717
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.10 (above normal)1617
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed1017
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -5.3% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most311
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 5 of 9611
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.52)66
SWKS: share of the available points, by componentSWKS: share of the available points, by componentAccruals85%Discretionary accruals31%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score93%Montier C-score60%Piotroski F-score56%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Skyworks Solutions: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.