Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › TKO Group Holdings › Earnings quality

TKO Group Holdings earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score52 / 100 · grade C · rank 846 of 1027

TKO Group Holdings (TKO) scores 52 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 846 of 1027 companies and 29 of 30 in communication. It loses the most points on adjusted earnings 61% below GAAP, accruals of -4.8% of assets, lower than 57% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.56).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -4.8% of assets, lower than 57% of companies (profit backed by cash)1527
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.56 (above normal)1220
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed1220
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -2.7% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most813
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 61% below GAAP013
Earnings smoothnessprofit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.56)57
TKO: share of the available points, by componentTKO: share of the available points, by componentAccruals57%Discretionary accruals56%Dechow F-score62%Montier C-score60%Earnings smoothness73%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → TKO Group Holdings: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.