Filing Flows › Companies › Txnm Energy › Earnings quality
Txnm Energy earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score67 / 100 · grade B · rank 470 of 1027
Txnm Energy (TXNM) scores 67 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 470 of 1027 companies and 25 of 55 in utilities. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.6% of assets, higher than 57% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 1 of 4 checks failed, discretionary accruals of -0.9% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most. It earns full or near-full marks for profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.80).
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -3.6% of assets, higher than 57% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 17 | 40 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 1 of 4 checks failed | 22 | 30 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of -0.9% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most | 17 | 20 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.80) | 10 | 10 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Txnm Energy: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.