Filing Flows › Companies › Wesco International › Earnings quality
Wesco International earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score41 / 100 · grade D · rank 955 of 1027
Wesco International (WCC) scores 41 of 100 for earnings quality, grade D: rank 955 of 1027 companies and 252 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on accruals of +3.3% of assets, higher than 94% of companies, Dechow F-score 2.23 (substantial), discretionary accruals of +8.0% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most. It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.20: in the grey zone.
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of +3.3% of assets, higher than 94% of companies | 1 | 20 |
| Beneish M-score | Beneish M-score -2.20: in the grey zone | 14 | 15 |
| Dechow F-score | Dechow F-score 2.23 (substantial) | 2 | 15 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 3 of 6 checks failed | 8 | 15 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of +8.0% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most | 2 | 10 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 5 of 9 | 6 | 10 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 7% below GAAP | 8 | 10 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.31) | 1 | 5 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Wesco International: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.