Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Walmart › Earnings quality

Walmart earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score89 / 100 · grade A · rank 3 of 1027

Walmart (WMT) scores 89 of 100 for earnings quality, grade A: rank 3 of 1027 companies and 1 of 141 in consumer-disc. It loses the most points on accruals of -7.2% of assets, lower than 73% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed. It earns full or near-full marks for Piotroski F-score 8 of 9, adjusted earnings 3% below GAAP, discretionary accruals of -0.3% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most.

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -7.2% of assets, lower than 73% of companies (profit backed by cash)1520
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.72: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.77 (normal)1515
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed1215
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -0.3% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most910
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 8 of 9910
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 3% below GAAP910
Earnings smoothnessprofit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.66)55
WMT: share of the available points, by componentWMT: share of the available points, by componentAccruals74%Discretionary accruals94%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score80%Piotroski F-score89%Non-GAAP gap91%Earnings smoothness92%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Walmart: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.