Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Wynn Resorts › Earnings quality

Wynn Resorts earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score74 / 100 · grade B · rank 202 of 1027

Wynn Resorts (WYNN) scores 74 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 202 of 1027 companies and 39 of 141 in consumer-disc. It loses the most points on Montier C-score 3 of 5 checks failed, accruals of -7.9% of assets, lower than 76% of companies (profit backed by cash), adjusted earnings 9% below GAAP. It earns full or near-full marks for profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.62), Dechow F-score 0.65 (normal).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -7.9% of assets, lower than 76% of companies (profit backed by cash)2027
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.65 (normal)2020
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 3 of 5 checks failed820
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -1.0% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most1113
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 9% below GAAP913
Earnings smoothnessprofit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.62)67
WYNN: share of the available points, by componentWYNN: share of the available points, by componentAccruals76%Discretionary accruals82%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score40%Non-GAAP gap70%Earnings smoothness84%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Wynn Resorts: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.