Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Xplr Infrastructure, LP › Earnings quality

Xplr Infrastructure, LP earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score60 / 100 · grade C · rank 707 of 1027

Xplr Infrastructure, LP (XIFR) scores 60 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 707 of 1027 companies and 38 of 55 in utilities. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.9% of assets, higher than 53% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 2 of 4 checks failed, adjusted earnings 21% above GAAP. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.35 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.22).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -3.9% of assets, higher than 53% of companies (profit backed by cash)1227
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.35 (normal)2020
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 2 of 4 checks failed1020
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +2.9% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most713
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 21% above GAAP413
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.22)77
XIFR: share of the available points, by componentXIFR: share of the available points, by componentAccruals47%Discretionary accruals54%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score50%Non-GAAP gap30%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Xplr Infrastructure, LP: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.