Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Comparisons › BYOP vs CDNL

KiNRG vs Cardinal Infrastructure Group: BYOP and CDNL compared

KiNRG is the larger company: $369M of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 2026) against $227M for Cardinal Infrastructure Group (Q2 2026). Cardinal Infrastructure Group is more profitable, with an operating margin of 6.8% against 4.6%.

KiNRG vs Cardinal Infrastructure Group, latest quarterKiNRG vs Cardinal Infrastructure Group, latest quarterKiNRG (BYOP)Cardinal Infrastructure Group (CDNL)Revenue$369M$227MOperating margin4.6%6.8%Net margin4.4%2.1%

Where the money goes: BYOP and CDNL

KiNRG (BYOP) · Q2 2026

KiNRG, Q2 2026: revenue $369M, operating margin 4.6%, net earnings $16.3M, operating cash flow $108M. The chart follows the revenue to costs, profit and cash.

Cardinal Infrastructure Group (CDNL) · Q2 2026

Cardinal Infrastructure Group, Q2 2026: revenue $227M (+114% year over year), operating margin 6.8%, net earnings $4.7M, operating cash flow $12.7M. The chart follows the revenue to costs, profit and cash.

KiNRG (BYOP)Cardinal Infrastructure Group (CDNL)
Latest quarterQ2 2026Q2 2026
Revenue$369M$227M
Revenue growth, Y/Y—+114%
Gross margin6.0%—
Operating margin4.6%6.8%
Net earnings$16.3M$4.7M
Net margin4.4%2.1%
Operating cash flow$108M$12.7M

Questions

Which is bigger, KiNRG or Cardinal Infrastructure Group?

KiNRG is the larger company: $369M of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 2026) against $227M for Cardinal Infrastructure Group (Q2 2026).

Is KiNRG or Cardinal Infrastructure Group growing faster?

Cardinal Infrastructure Group is more profitable, with an operating margin of 6.8% against 4.6%.

More: KiNRG earnings · how KiNRG makes money · Cardinal Infrastructure Group earnings · how Cardinal Infrastructure Group makes money

From the companies' latest 10-Q, 10-K or earnings release (10-Q filed Aug 19, 2026; 10-Q filed Aug 12, 2026). Fiscal quarters can end on different dates. Not investment advice.