Filing Flows › Comparisons › CHUC vs MEHA
Charlie's Holdings vs Functional Brands: CHUC and MEHA compared
Charlie's Holdings is the larger company: $3.8M of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 2026) against $1.9M for Functional Brands (Q2 2026). Charlie's Holdings is growing faster (+116% against +2% a year earlier). Charlie's Holdings is more profitable, with an operating margin of -32.5% against -70.6%.
Where the money goes: CHUC and MEHA
Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) · Q2 2026
Charlie's Holdings, Q2 2026: revenue $3.8M (+116% year over year), operating margin -32.5%, net loss $1.7M, operating cash flow −$383K. The chart follows the revenue to costs, profit and cash.
Functional Brands (MEHA) · Q2 2026
Functional Brands, Q2 2026: revenue $1.9M (+2% year over year), operating margin -70.6%, net loss $2.6M, operating cash flow −$519K. The chart follows the revenue to costs, profit and cash.
| Charlie's Holdings (CHUC) | Functional Brands (MEHA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest quarter | Q2 2026 | Q2 2026 |
| Revenue | $3.8M | $1.9M |
| Revenue growth, Y/Y | +116% | +2% |
| Operating margin | -32.5% | -70.6% |
| Net earnings | −$1.7M | −$2.6M |
| Net margin | -43.7% | -140.6% |
| Operating cash flow | −$383K | −$519K |
Questions
Which is bigger, Charlie's Holdings or Functional Brands?
Charlie's Holdings is the larger company: $3.8M of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 2026) against $1.9M for Functional Brands (Q2 2026).
Is Charlie's Holdings or Functional Brands growing faster?
Charlie's Holdings is growing faster (+116% against +2% a year earlier).
Which is more profitable, Charlie's Holdings or Functional Brands?
Charlie's Holdings is more profitable, with an operating margin of -32.5% against -70.6%.
More: Charlie's Holdings earnings · how Charlie's Holdings makes money · Functional Brands earnings · how Functional Brands makes money
From the companies' latest 10-Q, 10-K or earnings release (10-Q filed Aug 17, 2026; 10-Q filed Aug 14, 2026). Fiscal quarters can end on different dates. Not investment advice.