Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Comparisons › KD vs SAIC

Kyndryl Holdings vs Science Applications International: KD and SAIC compared

Kyndryl Holdings is the larger company: $3.7B of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 FY27) against $1.9B for Science Applications International (Q2 FY27). Science Applications International is growing faster (+6% against -2% a year earlier). Science Applications International is more profitable, with an operating margin of 8.1% against 3.1%.

Kyndryl Holdings vs Science Applications International, latest quarterKyndryl Holdings vs Science Applications International, latest quarterKyndryl Holdings (KD)Science Applications International (SAIC)Revenue$3.7B$1.9BRevenue growth, Y/Y-2%+6%Operating margin3.1%8.1%Net margin1.6%5.4%

Where the money goes: KD and SAIC

Kyndryl Holdings (KD) · Q2 FY27

Kyndryl Holdings, Q2 FY27: revenue $3.7B (-2% year over year), operating margin 3.1%, net earnings $59.0M, operating cash flow $173M. The chart follows the revenue to costs, profit and cash.

Science Applications International (SAIC) · Q2 FY27

Science Applications International, Q2 FY27: revenue $1.9B (+6% year over year), operating margin 8.1%, net earnings $102M, operating cash flow $146M. The chart follows the revenue to costs, profit and cash.

Kyndryl Holdings revenue by segment, Q2 FY27Kyndryl Holdings revenue by segment, Q2 FY27Principal Markets$1.2BUnited States$980MStrategic Markets$939MJapan$555M
Science Applications International revenue by segment, Q2 FY27Science Applications International revenue by segment, Q2 FY27Defense and Intelligence$1.4BCivilian$431M
Kyndryl Holdings (KD)Science Applications International (SAIC)
Latest quarterQ2 FY27Q2 FY27
Revenue$3.7B$1.9B
Revenue growth, Y/Y-2%+6%
Operating margin3.1%8.1%
Net earnings$59.0M$102M
Net margin1.6%5.4%
Operating cash flow$173M$146M
Free cash flow—$131M
Market value$3.5B$6.2B
P/E46.2×16.3×
Analysts’ mean target$17.40$132.56

Where the revenue comes from

Kyndryl Holdings

Science Applications International

Questions

Which is bigger, Kyndryl Holdings or Science Applications International?

Kyndryl Holdings is the larger company: $3.7B of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 FY27) against $1.9B for Science Applications International (Q2 FY27).

Is Kyndryl Holdings or Science Applications International growing faster?

Science Applications International is growing faster (+6% against -2% a year earlier).

Which is more profitable, Kyndryl Holdings or Science Applications International?

Science Applications International is more profitable, with an operating margin of 8.1% against 3.1%.

More: Kyndryl Holdings earnings · how Kyndryl Holdings makes money · Science Applications International earnings · how Science Applications International makes money

From the companies' latest 10-Q, 10-K or earnings release (10-Q filed Nov 4, 2026; 10-Q filed Aug 31, 2026). Fiscal quarters can end on different dates. Not investment advice.