Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Comparisons › SAIC vs PSN

Science Applications International vs Parsons: SAIC and PSN compared

Science Applications International is the larger company: $1.9B of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 FY27) against $1.7B for Parsons (Q3 2026). Science Applications International is growing faster (+6% against +2% a year earlier). Science Applications International is more profitable, with an operating margin of 8.1% against 6.3%.

Science Applications International vs Parsons, latest quarterScience Applications International vs Parsons, latest quarterScience Applications International (SAIC)Parsons (PSN)Revenue$1.9B$1.7BRevenue growth, Y/Y+6%+2%Operating margin8.1%6.3%Net margin5.4%3.3%Free cash flow$131M$251M

Where the money goes: SAIC and PSN

Science Applications International (SAIC) · Q2 FY27

Science Applications International, Q2 FY27: revenue $1.9B (+6% year over year), operating margin 8.1%, net earnings $102M, operating cash flow $146M. The chart follows the revenue to costs, profit and cash.

Parsons (PSN) · Q3 2026

Parsons, Q3 2026: revenue $1.7B (+2% year over year), operating margin 6.3%, net earnings $54.2M, operating cash flow $269M. The chart follows the revenue to costs, profit and cash.

Science Applications International revenue by segment, Q2 FY27Science Applications International revenue by segment, Q2 FY27Defense and Intelligence$1.4BCivilian$431M
Parsons revenue by segment, Q3 2026Parsons revenue by segment, Q3 2026Critical Infrastructure Segment$846MFederal Solution Segment$805M
Science Applications International (SAIC)Parsons (PSN)
Latest quarterQ2 FY27Q3 2026
Revenue$1.9B$1.7B
Revenue growth, Y/Y+6%+2%
Operating margin8.1%6.3%
Net earnings$102M$54.2M
Net margin5.4%3.3%
Operating cash flow$146M$269M
Free cash flow$131M$251M
Market value$6.2B$5.1B
P/E16.3×35.1×
Analysts’ mean target$132.56$60.45

Where the revenue comes from

Science Applications International

Parsons

Questions

Which is bigger, Science Applications International or Parsons?

Science Applications International is the larger company: $1.9B of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 FY27) against $1.7B for Parsons (Q3 2026).

Is Science Applications International or Parsons growing faster?

Science Applications International is growing faster (+6% against +2% a year earlier).

Which is more profitable, Science Applications International or Parsons?

Science Applications International is more profitable, with an operating margin of 8.1% against 6.3%.

More: Science Applications International earnings · how Science Applications International makes money · Parsons earnings · how Parsons makes money

From the companies' latest 10-Q, 10-K or earnings release (10-Q filed Aug 31, 2026; 10-Q filed Oct 28, 2026). Fiscal quarters can end on different dates. Not investment advice.