Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Affiliated Managers Group › Analysis traps

Affiliated Managers Group (AMG): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q2 2026, to Jun 30, 2026, filed Aug 7, 2026; rules v1.1

Affiliated Managers Group (AMG): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Jun 30, 2026. 1 to review; 3 with insufficient data; 5 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

Adjusted profit = economic profit To review · confidence low

Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 2 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not applicable

a financial company: free cash flow after capex is not the measure of its business

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high

Stock compensation is 2.9% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal yearFY2025
Stock compensation$59M
Revenue$2.1B
SBC / revenue+2.9%
Buybacks$706M
Buybacks / SBC11.9
Diluted shares, year before36.1M shares
Diluted shares33.0M shares
Diluted shares: change-8.6%

SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section

Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not applicable

a financial company: receivables and DSO are not its working capital

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit To review confidence low

Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 2 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.

The figures and how they are read
Quarter / adjusted EPS / GAAP EPS / gap2025-09-30 / 6.1 / 6.87 / -0.126; 2026-03-31 / 8.23 / 3.84 / 0.533; 2026-06-30 / 8.29 / 6.95 / 0.162
Quarters with adjusted ≥ 10% above GAAP2
Quarters compared3
Latest gap+16.2%

the analysts' 'actual' (usually the company's adjusted EPS) against GAAP net income ÷ diluted shares for the matching quarter; a gap of 10% or more counts (the stand-in until three releases' reconciliation tables are on file)

Source: 2025-09-30 (adjusted 6.10 vs GAAP 6.87) · 2026-03-31 (adjusted 8.23 vs GAAP 3.84) · 2026-06-30 (adjusted 8.29 vs GAAP 6.95)

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Insufficient data

neither a maturity table nor the current portion of debt is on file

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Insufficient data

no quarter with EPS, net income and diluted shares for both this year and last

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not applicable

a financial company: J06 reads its cycle instead

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value Insufficient data

no DCF in the valuation research for this company

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Affiliated Managers Group: cash flow →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.