Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Disclosures › Analysis traps

Analysis traps: where the figures could mislead you

10 rules on 4,197 companies' filings, each a common misreading of a figure: FCF growth = the business improved (651), stock compensation added back = no economic cost (1139), receivables growing = future cash is certain (231), adjusted profit = economic profit (95), low net debt = no refinancing risk (277), EPS growth = profit growth (8), low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued (54), A precise DCF value = the true value (0), A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe (22), A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe (33). A triggered rule is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

A01 · FCF growth = the business improved 651 of 4197

Free cash flow rose, but working capital released cash or capital expenditure fell: the part of the increase that need not repeat next year. Cases: C01, C09, C23 ·Papers: P01, P05, P21

A07 · Stock compensation added back = no economic cost 1139 of 4197

Stock compensation is a real cost paid in shares; 'adjusted' figures that add it back only hold up when buybacks have paid for the dilution.

B02 · Receivables growing = future cash is certain 231 of 4197

Receivables growing faster than revenue for two quarters, with days sales outstanding above its own history: more of each sale is still owed. Cases: C02, C03, C04, C06, C09, C10, C28, C29, C30, C31, C32, C33 ·Papers: P01, P02, P03, P05, P06, P16, P17, P18, P20, P25

B08 · Adjusted profit = economic profit 95 of 4197

Adjusted EPS at least 10% above GAAP quarter after quarter: the excluded costs are a recurring cost of the business. Cases: C05, C07, C08, C11, C12, C13, C15, C23, C24, C28, C32, C33, C34 ·Papers: P02, P03, P08, P18, P19

C02 · Low net debt = no refinancing risk 277 of 4197

Debt due within a year exceeds cash and investments plus the last twelve months' free cash flow: a low net debt says nothing about when it falls due. Cases: C14, C18, C20, C21, C25, C26 ·Papers: P15

D03 · EPS growth = profit growth 8 of 4197

EPS rose while net income was flat or down and the share count fell: the growth is the smaller denominator. Cases: C15, C22

E02 · Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued 54 of 4197

A low P/E on this year's profit when that profit is at a high against the last eight years: the multiple on mid-cycle profit is what matters. Papers: P04, P07, P24

E07 · A precise DCF value = the true value 0 of 4197

A DCF's point value against the terminal value's weight and the swing from each input: a range, not a number (always 'to review'). Cases: C16, C17, C19, C27 ·Papers: P22

No company triggers it on the latest filings.

J06 · A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe 22 of 4197

A bank at a low P/E on its best year of the last eight: provisions, deposit costs and capital turn the cycle, not the multiple. Cases: C20

J08 · A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe 33 of 4197

A REIT paying more in dividends than its net income is normal; paying more than its operating cash flow is the question.

What a newer filing changed last 180 days

Each rule is re-run when a company files; a trap that appears, goes, or changes severity between two filings is listed here (a rule changed on this site is not).

Cases and papers

The public cases and the papers behind the rules → the mechanism, the misreading, what to check and the normal explanation, as the cited material states them.

Practice

Practice on real filings → the figures first, then a reader's conclusion, then your call; the answer comes with the innocent explanations and what would show the trap does not apply.

Method

Ten rules of a hundred-item catalogue (docs/TRAP_RULEBOOK.md in the repository), chosen because the site already holds every figure they need: the cash bridge, capex, stock compensation and share counts, receivables, debt maturities, adjusted against GAAP EPS. Each reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula with coarse, documented thresholds and carries its figures, so a reader can apply stricter ones. Statuses: triggered, to review, not triggered, insufficient data, not applicable, out of date; missing data is never shown as clear. Severity and confidence are kept apart. The rules are independent of the earnings quality score and change nothing in it.

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.