Filing Flows › Companies › Seaboard › Analysis traps
Seaboard (SEB): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q3 2026, to Oct 3, 2026, filed Nov 3, 2026; rules v1.1
Seaboard (SEB): 1 rule of 10 triggered on the filings to Oct 3, 2026: low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued. 1 to review; 2 with insufficient data; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Triggered · severity medium · confidence medium
The shares trade at 6.2× this year's net income of $558M, but that profit is at a high: the median of the last eight fiscal years is $283M, on which the same market value is 12.3×. A low multiple of peak profit is not a low multiple of normal profit.
Innocent reading: The business has changed for good (a merger, a new line, a pricing regime) and the old years are not its normal.
A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high
The DCF's point value is 6,056.78 a share (price 3,631.40); 87% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from -1,093.30 to 13,206.90; across every method the research ran the range is -1,853 to 26,762. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high
Free cash flow did not rise ($8M → $6M): the trap does not arise.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year before | FY2024 |
| Fiscal year | FY2025 |
| Operating cash flow, year before | $519M |
| Operating cash flow | $568M |
| Capex, year before | $511M |
| Capex | $562M |
| Free cash flow, year before | $8M |
| Free cash flow | $6M |
| Change in FCF | −$2M |
| Change in capex | $51M |
| Working capital: change in its cash contribution | −$88M |
FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement
Source: FY2025 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Insufficient data
fewer than two fiscal years of stock compensation and share counts on file
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium
Receivables grew -1% against revenue 9% in Q3 2026; DSO 28 against a median of 30: collections are keeping pace with sales.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q3 2026 |
| Revenue, year over year | +9.1% |
| Receivables, year over year | -0.6% |
| Quarter before | Q2 2026 |
| Revenue y/y, quarter before | +17.8% |
| Receivables y/y, quarter before | +7.3% |
| Days sales outstanding | 27.9 |
| DSO, median of eight quarters | 29.7 |
| Receivables | $805M |
| Revenue | $2.8B |
receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before
Source: Q3 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data
no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium
$11M comes due within a year, 133.8× covered by cash and investments of $1.5B.
The figures and how they are read
| Cash and investments | $1.5B |
| Debt | $969M |
| Net debt | −$503M |
| Due within a year | $11M |
| Read from | the debt maturity table |
| Free cash flow, twelve months | −$10M |
| Cash plus free cash flow | $1.5B |
| Coverage of what is due | 133.8 |
| Due in the second year | $41M |
| Balance sheet date | 2026-10-03 |
due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed
Source: FY2025 (debt maturities, cash and investments)
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high
EPS fell 74% and net income fell 74% in Q3 2026; the share count fell 0.1%: EPS growth follows profit growth.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q3 2026 |
| Quarter before | Q3 2025 |
| EPS, year before | $113.70 |
| EPS | $29.23 |
| Net income, year before | $109M |
| Net income | $28M |
| Diluted shares, year before | 958,618 shares |
| Diluted shares | 957,794 shares |
| EPS growth | -74.3% |
| Net income growth | -74.3% |
| Diluted shares: change | -0.1% |
| eps from profit | -$84.50 |
| eps from share count | $0.03 |
EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)
Source: Q3 2026 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Triggered severity medium · confidence medium
The shares trade at 6.2× this year's net income of $558M, but that profit is at a high: the median of the last eight fiscal years is $283M, on which the same market value is 12.3×. A low multiple of peak profit is not a low multiple of normal profit.
The figures and how they are read
| market value | $3.5B |
| net income ttm | $558M |
| pe ttm | 6.20 |
| net income median fy | $283M |
| pe mid cycle | 12.30 |
| net income peak fy | $580M |
| years | FY2018 / -17.0; FY2019 / 283.0; FY2020 / 283.0; FY2021 / 570.0; FY2022 / 580.0; FY2023 / 226.0; FY2024 / 88.0; FY2025 / 496.0 |
| down years in window | 3 |
P/E on the trailing twelve months' net income against the P/E on the median net income of the last eight fiscal years (a mid-cycle stand-in); 'at a peak' = this year's profit at or above 90% of the best year and at least 1.3× the median
Source: Q3 2026 (net income, trailing twelve months)
What would explain it innocently
- The business has changed for good (a merger, a new line, a pricing regime) and the old years are not its normal
- The market is right that profit will fall, and the price already says so
- Capacity has left the industry, so the cycle's trough is higher than before
What to look for in the filing
- Where the industry's prices and volumes stand against their own history
- Capacity on order across the industry
- Management's view of the cycle in the MD&A
What would show the trap does not apply
- Profit holds at this level through the next two years (the eight-year peak was a new base, not a top)
- The industry's capacity and prices stay where they are rather than reverting
Look again: next filing.
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high
The DCF's point value is 6,056.78 a share (price 3,631.40); 87% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from -1,093.30 to 13,206.90; across every method the research ran the range is -1,853 to 26,762. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
The figures and how they are read
| dcf value | 6,056.78 |
| price | 3,631.40 |
| terminal value share | +86.9% |
| swing by input | Operating margin / ±3 pts / -1093.3 / 13206.9; WACC / ±1 pt / 4935.53 / 7875.36; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 5128.2 / 7173.49; Capex (share of revenue) / ±1 pt / 5522.91 / 6590.64 |
| range all methods | -1852.94; 26761.7 |
the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran
Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)
What would explain it innocently
- A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary
- The inputs that matter most are themselves well known (a regulated return, a long contract)
What to look for in the filing
- Which input you believe differs from the research's and why
- What the price implies for growth (the reverse DCF on the fair-value page)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The DCF's value is robust to the terminal growth and discount rate (the range's low end is still above the price)
- The company's cash flows over the next three years track the DCF's early years
Look again: next filing.
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable
not a REIT
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Seaboard: cash flow →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.