Filing Flows › Companies › TKO Group Holdings › Analysis traps
TKO Group Holdings (TKO): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q3 2026, to Sep 30, 2026, filed Nov 4, 2026; rules v1.1
TKO Group Holdings (TKO): 1 rule of 10 triggered on the filings to Sep 30, 2026: receivables growing = future cash is certain. 1 to review; 3 with insufficient data; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
Receivables growing = future cash is certain Triggered · severity high · confidence medium
Receivables grew 72% year over year in Q3 2026 against revenue growth of 21%, and the quarter before 67% against 18%; days sales outstanding is 70 against a median of 38 over the eight quarters before. More of each quarter's revenue is still owed by customers.
Innocent reading: Seasonality: a quarter that always ends with big shipments.
A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high
The DCF's point value is 355.94 a share (price 189.40); 70% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving revenue growth (each year) by ±5 pts alone takes it from 283.80 to 441.04; across every method the research ran the range is -171 to 2,127. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Insufficient data
fewer than two fiscal years with operating cash flow and capital expenditure on file
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high
Stock compensation is 2.5% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY2025 |
| Stock compensation | $118M |
| Revenue | $4.7B |
| SBC / revenue | +2.5% |
| Buybacks | $867M |
| Buybacks / SBC | 7.4 |
| Diluted shares, year before | 171.9M shares |
| Diluted shares | 194.0M shares |
| Diluted shares: change | +12.9% |
SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section
Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Triggered severity high · confidence medium
Receivables grew 72% year over year in Q3 2026 against revenue growth of 21%, and the quarter before 67% against 18%; days sales outstanding is 70 against a median of 38 over the eight quarters before. More of each quarter's revenue is still owed by customers.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q3 2026 |
| Revenue, year over year | +21.4% |
| Receivables, year over year | +71.9% |
| Quarter before | Q2 2026 |
| Revenue y/y, quarter before | +18.2% |
| Receivables y/y, quarter before | +67.3% |
| Days sales outstanding | 69.8 |
| DSO, median of eight quarters | 38.5 |
| Receivables | $1.0B |
| Revenue | $1.4B |
receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before
Source: Q3 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)
What would explain it innocently
- Seasonality: a quarter that always ends with big shipments
- An acquisition brought its own receivables
- New business with longer standard terms (government, large enterprise)
- Currency: receivables booked in a strengthening currency
What to look for in the filing
- The receivables ageing and the allowance for credit losses
- Any factoring or receivables sold (and whether with recourse)
- Credit terms by customer group
What would show the trap does not apply
- Receivables fall back in line with revenue in the next quarter and DSO returns to its history
- The 10-Q attributes the increase to a disclosed one-off (a large customer's timing, an acquisition) and the allowance for doubtful accounts did not rise
Look again: next filing.
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data
no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium
$41M comes due within a year, 60.7× covered by cash and investments of $631M plus $1.9B of free cash flow.
The figures and how they are read
| Cash and investments | $631M |
| Debt | $4.6B |
| Net debt | $4.0B |
| Due within a year | $41M |
| Read from | the debt maturity table |
| Free cash flow, twelve months | $1.9B |
| Cash plus free cash flow | $2.5B |
| Coverage of what is due | 60.7 |
| Due in the second year | $42M |
| Balance sheet date | 2026-09-30 |
due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed
Source: FY2025 (debt maturities, cash and investments)
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high
EPS rose 546% and net income rose 141% in Q3 2026; the share count fell 62.7%: EPS growth follows profit growth.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q3 2026 |
| Quarter before | Q3 2025 |
| EPS, year before | $0.21 |
| EPS | $1.33 |
| Net income, year before | $41M |
| Net income | $99M |
| Diluted shares, year before | 199.1M shares |
| Diluted shares | 74.2M shares |
| EPS growth | +546.1% |
| Net income growth | +140.7% |
| Diluted shares: change | -62.7% |
| eps from profit | $0.29 |
| eps from share count | $0.84 |
EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)
Source: Q3 2026 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Insufficient data
4 fiscal years of net income on file; a cycle needs five
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high
The DCF's point value is 355.94 a share (price 189.40); 70% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving revenue growth (each year) by ±5 pts alone takes it from 283.80 to 441.04; across every method the research ran the range is -171 to 2,127. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
The figures and how they are read
| dcf value | 355.94 |
| price | 189.40 |
| terminal value share | +70.2% |
| swing by input | Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 283.8 / 441.04; WACC / ±1 pt / 295.7 / 443.94; Operating margin / ±3 pts / 304.22 / 407.67; Tax rate / ±5 pts / 334.6 / 377.29 |
| range all methods | -170.66; 2127.11 |
the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran
Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)
What would explain it innocently
- A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary
- The inputs that matter most are themselves well known (a regulated return, a long contract)
What to look for in the filing
- Which input you believe differs from the research's and why
- What the price implies for growth (the reverse DCF on the fair-value page)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The DCF's value is robust to the terminal growth and discount rate (the range's low end is still above the price)
- The company's cash flows over the next three years track the DCF's early years
Look again: next filing.
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable
not a REIT
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → TKO Group Holdings: cash flow → Earnings quality score →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.