Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Southern › Analysis traps

Southern (SO): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q3 2026, to Sep 30, 2026, filed Nov 5, 2026; rules v1.1

Southern (SO): 1 rule of 10 triggered on the filings to Sep 30, 2026: low net debt = no refinancing risk. 1 to review; 2 with insufficient data; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

Low net debt = no refinancing risk Triggered · severity high · confidence medium

$6.2B of debt comes due within a year against $981M of cash and investments and no free cash flow to add: $5.2B short, to be refinanced or raised. Net debt of $73.5B says nothing about when the debt falls due.

Innocent reading: A committed, undrawn credit facility covers the gap (not visible in the balance sheet).

A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high

The DCF's point value is 60.84 a share (price 93.34); 98% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving wacc by ±1 pt alone takes it from 27.55 to 122.58; across every method the research ran the range is -43 to 309. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.

Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high

Free cash flow did not rise ($833M → −$2.9B): the trap does not arise.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal year beforeFY2024
Fiscal yearFY2025
Operating cash flow, year before$9.8B
Operating cash flow$9.8B
Capex, year before$9.0B
Capex$12.7B
Free cash flow, year before$833M
Free cash flow−$2.9B
Change in FCF−$3.8B
Change in capex$3.8B
Working capital: change in its cash contribution−$698M

FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement

Source: FY2025 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Insufficient data

fewer than two fiscal years of stock compensation and share counts on file

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium

Receivables grew 3% against revenue 8% in Q1 2026; DSO 33 against a median of 40: collections are keeping pace with sales.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ1 2026
Revenue, year over year+8.0%
Receivables, year over year+2.6%
Quarter beforeQ4 2025
Revenue y/y, quarter before+10.1%
Receivables y/y, quarter before+3.0%
Days sales outstanding33.3
DSO, median of eight quarters39.9
Receivables$3.1B
Revenue$8.4B

receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before

Source: Q1 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q1 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data

no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Triggered severity high · confidence medium

$6.2B of debt comes due within a year against $981M of cash and investments and no free cash flow to add: $5.2B short, to be refinanced or raised. Net debt of $73.5B says nothing about when the debt falls due.

The figures and how they are read
Cash and investments$981M
Debt$74.5B
Net debt$73.5B
Due within a year$6.2B
Read fromthe debt maturity table
Free cash flow, twelve months−$3.5B
Cash plus free cash flow$981M
Coverage of what is due0.2
Due in the second year$3.4B
Balance sheet date2026-03-31

due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed

Source: FY2025 (debt maturities, cash and investments)

What would explain it innocently

What to look for in the filing

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high

EPS fell 0% and net income rose 2% in Q1 2026; the share count rose 2.1%: EPS growth follows profit growth.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ1 2026
Quarter beforeQ1 2025
EPS, year before$1.21
EPS$1.20
Net income, year before$1.3B
Net income$1.4B
Diluted shares, year before1,105.0M shares
Diluted shares1,128.0M shares
EPS growth-0.4%
Net income growth+1.7%
Diluted shares: change+2.1%
eps from profit$0.02
eps from share count-$0.03

EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)

Source: Q1 2026 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q1 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not triggered confidence medium

Net income of $4.2B is not at a cyclical high against the last eight years (median $4.0B, best $4.7B): the P/E of 24.8× is on a normal year.

The figures and how they are read
market value$105.3B
net income ttm$4.2B
pe ttm24.80
net income median fy$4.0B
pe mid cycle26.50
net income peak fy$4.7B
yearsFY2018 / 2226.0; FY2019 / 4739.0; FY2020 / 3119.0; FY2021 / 2393.0; FY2022 / 3524.0; FY2023 / 3976.0; FY2024 / 4401.0; FY2025 / 4341.0
down years in window3

P/E on the trailing twelve months' net income against the P/E on the median net income of the last eight fiscal years (a mid-cycle stand-in); 'at a peak' = this year's profit at or above 90% of the best year and at least 1.3× the median

Source: Q3 2026 (net income, trailing twelve months)

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high

The DCF's point value is 60.84 a share (price 93.34); 98% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving wacc by ±1 pt alone takes it from 27.55 to 122.58; across every method the research ran the range is -43 to 309. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.

The figures and how they are read
dcf value60.84
price93.34
terminal value share+97.5%
swing by inputWACC / ±1 pt / 27.55 / 122.58; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 33.72 / 93.58; Operating margin / ±3 pts / 41.8 / 79.88; Terminal growth / ±0.5 pt / 51.35 / 73.54
range all methods-43.4; 308.52

the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran

Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)

What would explain it innocently

What to look for in the filing

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Southern: cash flow →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.