Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Astec Industries › Earnings quality

Astec Industries earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score43 / 100 · grade D · rank 942 of 1027

Astec Industries (ASTE) scores 43 of 100 for earnings quality, grade D: rank 942 of 1027 companies and 245 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on accruals of -1.9% of assets, higher than 74% of companies, Montier C-score 4 of 6 checks failed, adjusted earnings 80% below GAAP.

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -1.9% of assets, higher than 74% of companies520
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.12: in the grey zone1215
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.58 (above normal)915
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 4 of 6 checks failed515
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +2.9% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most510
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 6 of 9710
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 80% below GAAP010
Earnings smoothnessprofit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.18)05
ASTE: share of the available points, by componentASTE: share of the available points, by componentAccruals26%Discretionary accruals53%Beneish M-score78%Dechow F-score60%Montier C-score33%Piotroski F-score67%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Astec Industries: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.