Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Bally's › Analysis traps

Bally's (BALY): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q2 2026, to Jun 30, 2026, filed Aug 14, 2026; rules v1.1

Bally's (BALY): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Jun 30, 2026. 1 to review; 4 with insufficient data; 4 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

Adjusted profit = economic profit To review · confidence low

Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 2 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Insufficient data

fewer than two fiscal years with operating cash flow and capital expenditure on file

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Insufficient data

fewer than two fiscal years of stock compensation and share counts on file

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Insufficient data

no quarter a year earlier to compare the last two quarters with

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit To review confidence low

Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 2 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.

The figures and how they are read
Quarter / adjusted EPS / GAAP EPS / gap2025-09-30 / -3.8474 / -1.7 / -0.558; 2026-03-31 / -1.9972 / -2.69 / 0.347; 2026-06-30 / -1.02479 / -2.41 / 1.352
Quarters with adjusted ≥ 10% above GAAP2
Quarters compared3
Latest gap+135.2%

the analysts' 'actual' (usually the company's adjusted EPS) against GAAP net income ÷ diluted shares for the matching quarter; a gap of 10% or more counts (the stand-in until three releases' reconciliation tables are on file)

Source: 2025-09-30 (adjusted -3.85 vs GAAP -1.70) · 2026-03-31 (adjusted -2.00 vs GAAP -2.69) · 2026-06-30 (adjusted -1.02 vs GAAP -2.41)

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium

$19M comes due within a year, 20.1× covered by cash and investments of $390M.

The figures and how they are read
Cash and investments$390M
Debt$4.5B
Net debt$4.1B
Due within a year$19M
Read fromthe debt maturity table
Free cash flow, twelve months—
Cash plus free cash flow$390M
Coverage of what is due20.1
Due in the second year$19M
Balance sheet date2026-06-30

due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed

Source: FY2024 (debt maturities, cash and investments)

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not applicable

a loss in one of the quarters: EPS growth has no meaning

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not applicable

a loss on a trailing or mid-cycle basis: the P/E has no meaning

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value Insufficient data

no DCF in the valuation research for this company

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Bally's: cash flow →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.