Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Boyd Gaming › Earnings quality

Boyd Gaming earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score51 / 100 · grade C · rank 867 of 1027

Boyd Gaming (BYD) scores 51 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 867 of 1027 companies and 125 of 141 in consumer-disc. It loses the most points on accruals of +13.4% of assets, higher than 98% of companies (profit running ahead of cash), discretionary accruals of +9.6% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, adjusted earnings 17% below GAAP. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.26 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.91).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of +13.4% of assets, higher than 98% of companies (profit running ahead of cash)027
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.26 (normal)2020
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 1 of 5 checks failed1620
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +9.6% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most213
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 17% below GAAP613
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.91)77
BYD: share of the available points, by componentBYD: share of the available points, by componentAccruals2%Discretionary accruals12%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score80%Non-GAAP gap43%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Boyd Gaming: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.