Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Guardant Health › Earnings quality

Guardant Health earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score64 / 100 · grade C · rank 575 of 1027

Guardant Health (GH) scores 64 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 575 of 1027 companies and 63 of 126 in health. It loses the most points on adjusted earnings 133% below GAAP, Montier C-score 3 of 6 checks failed, discretionary accruals of -5.9% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most. It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.79: clean (below −2.22), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.53). Revenue grew 42% in the year: fast growth raises accruals, the Beneish and Dechow scores and the C-score by construction, so a growing company scores lower than a steady one with the same accounting.

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -13.2% of assets, lower than 90% of companies (profit backed by cash)1820
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.79: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 1.43 (above normal)1015
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 3 of 6 checks failed815
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -5.9% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most310
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 5 of 9610
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 133% below GAAP010
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.53)55
GH: share of the available points, by componentGH: share of the available points, by componentAccruals90%Discretionary accruals27%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score70%Montier C-score50%Piotroski F-score56%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Guardant Health: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.