Filing Flows › Companies › G III Apparel Group › Earnings quality
G III Apparel Group earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score68 / 100 · grade B · rank 437 of 1027
G III Apparel Group (GIII) scores 68 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 437 of 1027 companies and 67 of 141 in consumer-disc. It loses the most points on Montier C-score 4 of 6 checks failed, discretionary accruals of -6.8% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, profit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.00). It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -3.17: clean (below −2.22), Dechow F-score 0.44 (normal).
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -11.7% of assets, lower than 88% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 19 | 22 |
| Beneish M-score | Beneish M-score -3.17: clean (below −2.22) | 17 | 17 |
| Dechow F-score | Dechow F-score 0.44 (normal) | 17 | 17 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 4 of 6 checks failed | 6 | 17 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of -6.8% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most | 2 | 11 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 6 of 9 | 7 | 11 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit far steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.00) | 0 | 6 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → G III Apparel Group: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.